Non-partisan
Montgomery County
Tennessee Voter Guide – 2022 Primary Races
How To Vote For, Not Against, Your Values
Our highest ratings go to candidates who will defend freedom, stand for free enterprise, or have a conservative and/or biblical worldview based on their ability to stand firm against efforts to increase taxes, size of government, weaken law and order, and crush individual freedom. Here is our rating system:
- ***** The best candidate. Our strongest endorsement.
- **** Very good.
- *** Acceptable.
- ** Vote only to prevent worse candidate(s) from winning.
- * Terrible. Do Not Vote. All your other votes will count.
Search Your District
Tennessee; Montgomery County, Governor of Tennessee; Primary Election
Bill Lee, Republican (Incumbent) **** (Endorsed)
Jason Martin, Democrat *
Constance M. Every, Independent (Not Rated)
John Gentry, Independent (Not Rated)
Basil Marceaux, Independent (Not Rated)
Charles Van Morgan, Independent (Not Rated)
Alfred O’Neil, Independent (Not Rated)
Deborah Rouse, Independent (Not Rated)
Michael E. Scantland, Independent (Not Rated)
Rick Tyler, Independent (Not Rated)
Tennessee; Montgomery County, United States House of Representatives, District 7
Mark E. Green, Republican **** (Endorsed)
Odessa Kelly, Democrat *
Steven J. Hooper, Independent (Not Rated)
Tennessee; Montgomery County, TN House, District 67; Republican Primary
Tommy J. Vallejos, Sr., Republican ***** (Endorsed)
Ronnie Glynn, Democrat **
Tennessee; Montgomery County, TN House, District 68; Republican Primary
Curtis Johnson, Republican
Monica Meeks, Independent (Not Rated)
Tennessee; Montgomery County, TN House, District 75; Republican Primary
Jeff Burkhart, Republican ****
JUDICIAL RATINGS
Judges sitting on the courts may be incompetent, corrupt or lazy. Even worse, many are political opportunists with a political agenda.
There are two types of judges: judicial activists and strict constructionists. A judicial activist legislates from the bench. Instead of strictly interpreting law, these judges make the laws. Instead of applying the law to facts, they rule based on their own values.
Judicial activists overturn voter-passed initiatives and laws passed by the state legislature because they personally have a different belief system, twist the law to rationalize their decisions, and impose their own moral codes, political beliefs, and secular values in an effort to reshape our society and promote social engineering.
Strict constructionists impartially arrive at a fair judgment based on law.
Judicial activists are usually more liberal; strict constructionists are usually more conservative.
HOW WE COME UP WITH A FINAL RATING
We come up with a final rating by taking the average of the candidate’s Judicial Index and Qualifications. For example, if the candidate had a Judicial Index of 8 and Qualifications of 6, their overall rating would be 7.
Rating
Judges are rated on a scale of 1-5 — 5 being best.
5 Stars – The best candidate. Our strongest endorsement
4 Stars – Very good
3 Stars – Acceptable
2 Stars – Vote only to prevent worse candidate(s) from winning
1 Star – Terrible. Do Not Vote, Unless We Say Endorsed. All Other Votes Will Count
For Voter Registration Lookup & Absentee By-mail Ballot Status Click Here.
Be sure to let your friends and neighbors know about the voter guide.
Note: We do not take money from any candidate for their endorsement. For over 20 years – we never have.
No corporations, political party, or group supports our research or efforts.
Only because of individuals like you are we able to publish a comprehensive voter guide.
Could you donate $10 or more to help cover our costs to expand our influence?