Parents and Grandparents — WARNING! The CDC/FDA Ideological Drive for Vaccinations for 5-Year-Olds is Not Science, it’s Potentially Dangerous Manipulation

Craig HueyCurrent Events, Family, Government, Politics1 Comment

The CDC/FDA ideological drive for vaccinations for 5-year-olds is not science, it’s potentially dangerous manipulation.

The approval of the COVID-19 vaccination by the CDC/FDA makes no sense based on the data.

Children under five are the final group of citizens who haven’t had access to get the COVID-19 vaccine. That’s approximately 18 million children.

However, parents beware. These vaccines may not prevent COVID or even provide the level of protection that the FDA, CDC, or your own doctor or pharmacists claim.

The current Pfizer/FDA/CDC protocol calls for 3 shots at one-tenth of the strength of an adult dose for children 5 and under.

Pfizer’s initial trials had over 4,500 children in the study, with ages ranging from 6 months to 4 yrs.

However, 3,000 didn’t make it to the end of the trials, and here’s why…

Six children ages 2-4 had severe COVID in the vaccine group and only 1 in the placebo group, which suggested a strong likelihood that the vaccine is causing COVID vs the likelihood that it isn’t.

Pfizer ignored the results.

Pfizer then gave the kids a second dose — 34 of the vaccinated kids got COVID vs only 13 in the placebo group, increasing the vaccinated kids’ chance of getting COVID by 30%.

Again, Pfizer ignored the data.

By the end of the trial, Pfizer ignored 97% of the COVID infections.

They used the data from 3 children who were vaccinated and got COVID with 7 kids from the placebo group, and this gave them their high efficacy data.

Is it just politics?

Is it ideology?

Is it a payoff?

Thanks to a filing under the Freedom of Information Act, a court order requiring Pfizer to release its clinical trial studies to the public is revealing some startling things regarding the drug’s efficacy…

It’s no wonder Pfizer wanted the information sealed for over 50 years.

One revealing thing that came from the document dump is found in “section D” entitled “Risk Factors”, which states:

“We may not be able to demonstrate sufficient efficacy of safety of our COVID-19 vaccine and/or variant-specific formulations to obtain permanent regulatory approval in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, or other countries where it has been authorized for emergency use or granted conditional marketing approval.”

Pfizer knew that their vaccination couldn’t pass regular FDA approval, so the workaround was to just have the government issue an “okay” for the vaccine’s use under the Emergency Measures Act.

In fact, within the same section of the document, Pfizer also states:

“Significant adverse events may occur during clinical trials or even after receiving regulatory approval, which could delay or terminate clinical trials, delay or prevent regulatory approval or market acceptance of any of our product candidates.”

“Even if we obtain full regulatory approval for our COVID-19 vaccine and product candidates, the products may not gain the market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals, cancer treatment centers and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.”

It’s clear, Pfizer was concerned that if doctors had access to their clinical trial data beforehand, that they would not be comfortable with the results of the trials.

Could this be the reason for the “disinformation bureau” and the push to discredit and even fire any doctor or medical researcher that had questions regarding the CDC and the WHO’s strict regulations and guidelines?

The truth keeps coming out, no matter how much they try to hide it.

Here’s what the document dump has revealed so far:

  • Pfizer knew that natural immunity works— It showed that they knew that people who were previously infected by COVID had no difference in outcome from those who were vaccinated—neither group needed to be hospitalized.
  • Their own internal trials showed that natural immunity was statistically identical (or better) to the vaccine against infection, but the drug company, the government, and the CDC said natural immunity was not effective against COVID.
  • Adverse reactions from the vaccine were more severe and frequent in younger groups. Side-effects included a heart condition called myocarditis (rate of occurrence 10 in 100,000); the bulk of the cases is in younger males. The documents also stated that the effects on pregnant women, fetuses, sperm, fertility, or nursing children were unknown.
  • ADE (Antibody Dependent Reaction) response — A weakening of your immune system.

The release forms for the trial warned that the vaccine/drug could trigger a worse illness than what you have, because it makes your white blood cell count drop (white blood cells attack infections/disease).

In other words, it can make your illness a lot worse and make you a lot sicker.

Independent studies are revealing new problems as well.

A recent study by the New York State Department of Health found that the effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine for COVID provided little protection for children between 5 to 11 years old. The study found that the vaccine’s effectiveness went from 68% to 12% during the omicron surge.

In their studies, the FDA and Pfizer were counting COVID infections among 5-year-olds who received 3 doses of the vaccine, which resulted in an efficacy of 80%.

However, according to government guidelines, doctors have been giving this age group just 2 shots, which they say lowers the efficacy.

The FDA said they will review the “new” data and that they may need to instruct doctors to increase the dosages for 5-year-olds to 3 shots in order to reach their 80% efficacy results.

Yet upon closer examination, the FDA and Pfizer only counted cases after they received the third shot.  So, out of the 375 subjects used in the trial, 365 infections occurred before the third dose.

If they included the other 97 percent of the subjects infected, the effectiveness drops to roughly 20 percent, which is below the standards the FDA uses to determine the approvability of a drug.

Imagine what’s yet to be discovered as we get more information on Pfizer’s court-ordered document release, and more independent peer-reviewed studies are conducted.

Watch the powerful video from Dr. Clare Craig, as she shows how Pfizer twisted the clinical trial data for young children — about 4 minutes.

Click HERE to watch.

Plus, watch another powerful 2-minute video from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis HERE about his take on vaccinations for young children.

What do you think? Let me know at craig@electionforum.org

One Comment on “Parents and Grandparents — WARNING! The CDC/FDA Ideological Drive for Vaccinations for 5-Year-Olds is Not Science, it’s Potentially Dangerous Manipulation”

  1. Dr. Ardis has been reporting these facts since last year, even for adults. It’s scary that he has known about this before the results have been released.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.